if it exist

that is how you get there

at least, that's one way to get tehre

I come from the perspective that logic is just our own construction on the basis of our limitations

looking outwards to an infinite universe

The argumentation for God is hardly axiomatic from a monotheistic perspective. After presupposing an existence for God, you simply apply the three elements of a Christian God - omnipotence, omnipresence and omniscience, and knowing that an all-knowing God knows good and a perfect God imposes good.

if there were..

identification from the basis of negatives, but anything can be defined by a negative, and that is just feigning the question

is the basis of it

if there were

but there is more to it than that epic

ya i agree

I'm not assuming logic to exist independent of consciousness

if there were, then it's immoral to not act on it imo

only the god of the npcs imposes good

well

if it's not god of good

I don't want anything to do with him

I think if you were to believe in a god, transcendentalism is the fairest approach to go about it

unless there is something I don't know..

what would a good imposing god do if one of us does a lil bit evil, due to free will, strike us down?

yes, and I am a for that

transcendence

no

I hope he understands the underpinnings

it doesn't make sense for god to punish us to any degree that isn't our own fault

Stop anti semitism

but i wonder how you go from deism to theism from that approach?

and I mean actaully punish

not just this guy's having a hard time

I don't

there might be 1 god

there might be several

there might be none

but if god exists..

this is what he would do

if anything

if he doens't exist

then I'll do it

<:smugooze:398100987866251265>