ROFL

Nerth blocked Romulus.

Oh

Libtard owned

you're not even addressing the same arguments

Well, did I make any points, Nerth, or at least come off reasonable?

Guess he wasnt enjoying this shared perspective

The time for arguments is over

<:horrified:603092309307031560><:Gun:639978512207314973><:peek:396543715587391491>

no, Helton I don't see that you did

I think Nerth might be a sperg fr.

Yup

<:powerful:639994936070242315>

I asked you how what you're saying solves is/ought

and you didn't answer

<:spurdo:640003428290134026>

you said 'god'

ok

I don't know it seems to have come full circle in his argument.

that doesn't mean anything to me

I tried to define grounding after that to answer the question.

That's because you're a mutant Nerth

okay, well I don't agree that if your argument is grounded than its true then

<:spurdo:640003428290134026>

I still am not certain what you mean by grounded

can I get a tldr of this "debate"

you just said 'its grounded by god'

Grounded means that there is something or someone the morality is ground in, enforcing it.

GO TO YOUR ROOM

"you dont convince me"nanananana im putting my fingers in my ears" - Nerthulas

YOU'RE GROUNDED

he needs to specify that as DNA lifeforms the matrix he speaks off is a result of genes and that variance even within human pop can lead to variance of perspective but i agree with nerths general points he's making i don't see what the arguments were just going on tangents about stuff

>So, grounded is something enforcing or justifying it.

<:powerful:639994936070242315>

So @Nerthulas are you arguing everything is objective, but our human minds are subjective and therefore morality is decided by subjectivity dispite our obility to quanify the objective world with our senses and record it then make abstract and practical evaluations of that?

Its not black and white

there is a difference between positive statements about what is true, which describe reality, and statements of preference - when you say grounded, do you mean that it is something which would make statements about preference/normative statements true, descriptors of reality @Hector

?