Message from @ALternativeToLife
Discord ID: 640230077329702916
heh
funni banjod
I use my high verbal iq allt he time for word jokings
I dl that asian vid and called it ChadChong
did people remove the jew moji?
@Nerthulas u agree>
I was gonna post it, but can't find
?
❓
<:kraut:389881471881576448>
this
<:spurdo:640003428290134026>
@Nerthulas thanks for tagging me
yw
<:mlady:389497741769703424>
did u read my tag
nerth
do u agree
yeah I agree, but at least Romulus was using it in a different way
he was using it to be intersubjective
but he was opening up like
a third argument which was totally tangential
ye he does that
idk why
I don't really even understand which one he was trying to respond to
i think it's like because he's trying to tie it into some other thing he believes
@Nerthulas Okay, you think that morality is subjective to the cats own perferences. Well I disagree, I think morality (assuming the cat is sentient and not just a flesh and bone robot ie Golem) for the cat would but subject to the limitations of what the cat is potentially capable of (at least in terms judging it) and the a human would be subject to morality as best as one is potentially capable of, but that morality is not subjective.
YASSSSS
wait how is the morality not subjective you didn't say why?
well we can describe the cat's preferences in positive (descriptive/'objective') terms, but the preferences themselves are normative (subjective)
if it's coming from these 2 sentient entities it's subjective to each
it could be positive/objective that the cat's preferences exist, and that they have x consequences
<:powerful:639994936070242315>
but the preference *itself* is normative/subjective
Sure, but I think ones preferences (Pathos, Feelings) have nothing to do wtih morality.
acts act on morality, but they are not capable of really using it