Message from @M'beke
Discord ID: 640618597684871179
on avg
Womens lower IQ is irrelevant when plenty of men have lower IQ than women, it's such a bad argument and a display of retarded values for when people argue for women to stay at home etc.
A society of 130 average IQ populace would collapse
As long as we bring back mass executions, the West will reach the stars.
Women don't need to be as smart and have greater value making families that's it end off
yeah, 100IQ individuals should have their place in society
even lower...
well, no one argues women should stay at home because of iq but because of personality traits and children
Give me those 65iq thots
or better stay out of some fields
```China is the last sovereign country in the world. Authoritarian but willing - unlike U.N.-governed countries - to give its people the freedom to do what they want. Listen to me. This is real freedom, freedom to own property, make a profit, make your life. The West, so afraid of strong government, now has no government. Only financial power.```
Deus Ex, what an incredible game.
Vanessa worries too much about IQ. There’s literally an optimal level of IQ. You don’t want to be too IQ or too low.
ppl do argue this, that women are less capable so they shouldn't be allowed to work
but it's so retarded not even the national socialists believed this
here you go
socrates argued against it, said women should work
if it was in their nature
@Vanessa Cross do you think we can seriously enact a policy that would get 50%+ of the population to stop breeding?
women do naturally work, home making is part of this but it doesn't take up her whole day it's delusional, they can work part time no problem as long as they don't out compete men who are expected to be the primary providers for the family
if society has enough jobs and it can strengthen the nation through more productiveness then go for it imo
@Hector that's never going to happen ofc; I was just hoping genetic engineering was going to save us but seems like a pipe dream <:imfine:397531800022286336>
<:basedmama:396156349676781569>
Imagine Boris or Trump saying, “today, if you have an IQ under 100, you can not have children” , and the crowds cheering “yeah!”.
>goodbye most of your voter base
would make perfectly sense for the crowd to cheer
and he'd probably still win
@Vanessa Cross then have some babies. Stop cucking yourself. Literally, the right is in more need of women now than ever.
<:gib:639983301385256999>
The problem occurs when you don't provide avg/low iq people with purpose. And instead provide them income without providing to society
Especially since I’ve seen your test results, I think you could make a good mom. When with results like yours naturally have 2-4 children don’t deny yourself for a pipe dream. @Vanessa Cross
@Hector 80% of people think they're above average and the average IQ would probably be lower than the general populace so dunny kruger effect idk <:kekboi:417880491182653450>
or when you give the a purpose that they cannot justly fulfill, such as voting
Daily reminder the anti natalists are right and it's best for us all to stop reproducing <:dab:395562678153904128>
you first
Even when you were a retarded femoid, you even wanted children then.