Message from @blanc

Discord ID: 641869348973314052


2019-11-07 05:16:34 UTC  

Biologists literally do it through observation

2019-11-07 05:16:43 UTC  

living environment and behavior

2019-11-07 05:16:44 UTC  

etc

2019-11-07 05:17:10 UTC  

@TheUserNameofPeace This is where you fall apart tho, and its probably the weakest arguement you can make.

To quote Jeffery Long:
" Specifically, human population structure strongly biases the outcome of analyses by violating two assumptions: first, that expected genetic diversity is the same in every population; and second, that divergence between all pairs of populations is equal and independent."

Like the picture of the FST values you posted that has those cited papers using genetic levels to support subspecies classifications, they all apply genetic technology to systems that have previously described subspecies and then look at the genetic differentiation between those groupings. Basically, they can only describe the differences between the already identified categories.

The problem with you in particualar is that you see a blog with citations then assume its making the claim the blog is making, so please stop.

2019-11-07 05:17:16 UTC  

Guys you ready to see trve aryan worship?

2019-11-07 05:17:35 UTC  

MAGA

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/641868835590242309/1573093891512.jpg

2019-11-07 05:18:27 UTC  

@Punished Arditi lol you have to a crazy methed out back roll into poop to be a hindi

2019-11-07 05:18:32 UTC  

<:monkaS:299267496668692493>

2019-11-07 05:18:35 UTC  

@Yek You are literally trying to argue there against the totality of Science

2019-11-07 05:18:40 UTC  

Science is stats

2019-11-07 05:18:42 UTC  

Yek he is

2019-11-07 05:18:49 UTC  

And applying the model both best fits

2019-11-07 05:19:00 UTC  

@Yek MMW is not that type of person tbqh

2019-11-07 05:19:09 UTC  

blog post?

2019-11-07 05:19:12 UTC  

The model that best fits matches our observations and history

2019-11-07 05:19:13 UTC  

what is this 2006?

2019-11-07 05:19:16 UTC  

***shock***

2019-11-07 05:19:20 UTC  

He looked filled with zeal

2019-11-07 05:19:32 UTC  

Where is the argument Yek

2019-11-07 05:19:38 UTC  

You lost me there

2019-11-07 05:19:44 UTC  

What are you guys debating

2019-11-07 05:19:45 UTC  

Ill read again

2019-11-07 05:19:47 UTC  

@Deleted User he does it all the time, especially in politics. He cites, incel.wiki, althype, and jf as his reputable sources lol

2019-11-07 05:19:48 UTC  

1+1=2?

2019-11-07 05:20:22 UTC  

@Yek Oh yeah, Yek also opposed the woman question

2019-11-07 05:20:30 UTC  

jf is pretty reputable tbqh

2019-11-07 05:20:33 UTC  

And you duffus, incel wiki just culimated tons of studies

2019-11-07 05:20:43 UTC  

I cite the studies on pub med science direct etc

2019-11-07 05:20:46 UTC  

you just don't agree with thim

2019-11-07 05:20:50 UTC  

And you do the same shit, deny stats

2019-11-07 05:20:54 UTC  

When you dont like the outcome

2019-11-07 05:21:00 UTC  
2019-11-07 05:21:01 UTC  

"They cheated on study dude"

2019-11-07 05:21:07 UTC  
2019-11-07 05:21:09 UTC  

You

2019-11-07 05:21:20 UTC  

@TheUserNameofPeace The academics?

2019-11-07 05:21:38 UTC  

Pubmed is a place where academics publish, yes

2019-11-07 05:22:01 UTC  

In any case, do you see your failure on race?

2019-11-07 05:22:08 UTC  

If race was biologically accurate id vouch for it.

2019-11-07 05:22:09 UTC  

its all so tiresome