Take it to the moral domain

You can't say 4 yo trans is wrong

Because you can start from w/e axiom and justify it

basically interacting at a different angle transforms it into a slightly different quantum system with a different basis vectors

That's the problem

you just can't know everthing at once

well.... so many things are relative... even the weak mixing angle changes with momentum of the observer.

I get all that

but you can get snippets of time,

But it's a problem

location or speed

old shit

http://is2.4chan.org/wsg/1571960948232.webm

did you know neutrinos dont have a definite mass?

they exist simultaneously as a superposition of different masses

If you say it's all relative and therefore one set of axioms as just as "valid" as another the you are to might makes right

a lot of things you think are cut and dry arent so simple

So you either need to make that explicit and let's just have huge war

Or you need to refute it and point to actual solidity

i started as an objectivist like you

i wanted to believe

i had to abandon it as untenable

If you don't want whites wiped out, brave new world, and your kids to be trans you better get a fleet of nukes then

Because it's just might makes right

If the Darwinian randomness/radical relativistic Einsteinian worldview is right and what we are going to adopt

Our opponents don't hestitate to identify what is right and wrong

White men are in total wrong

Homo trans are in total right

etc

quality exchange

@JCDenton please change your pic to this:

@JCDenton yeah why is your profile pic not the actual JC Denton?

Postal was a very funny game

sometimes you gotta share the pain

You put a cats anus on the end of an M16 and shoot through lol very educational game

that's Deus Ex

not Postal

This is Deus Ex. But Denton can basically be cyberpunk version of the Postal guy.