The other one gimme a sec

anyways. Jesus was the important figure

not the pope

and I listen to jesus as spoken of through his apostles

not a pope

"Papal infallibility is a dogma of the Catholic Church that states that, in virtue of the promise of Jesus to Peter, the Pope is preserved from the possibility of error "when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church.""

so where does debate come into this

Peter wanted to make a statement about faith

that you should not associate with Gentiles

When in exercise

Paul BTFO'd him on that theological question

they dead

Look up ex cathedra

blanc this is some serious mental gymnastics

What?

The when there

Ik what ex cathedra is and ex cathedra does not extend to Papal infallibility

Is explained in detail later

I'll leave this to you 2

@Hector 37B

Guys, it’s cold outside again. : )))))

I'm in the new house of Glory

Thats about the nilitary of South Korea

:0

When you have Papal Infallibility it means that whatever theological question the Pope speaks about, it is true and perfect. This is your dogma. No need for it to be ex cathedra

Only thru ex cathedra and the popes know it cant be used lightly

It was a measure for fighting prots

there wasn't a central authority for 1000 years roughly

Where?

it was splitt between the cities

anywhere

You mean anti popes?

they could govern themselves

There is defined line of legitimate popes

Ahh

prior to 1054 there was no central authority like Rome, and Rome was also treated as an equal

Yea

yes

But rome was more important always mate

then things went down a dark path