I also took the gen ed in community college, so the instruction was hit or miss tbh

I think a lot of what he says is plausible in all honesty, its just not dealing with the same methodology as empirical anglo science

@Nerthulas Sorry, I don’t speak coomer

Science is empirical

almost 20 years ago

<:monkaS:299267496668692493>

<:Monster:642474898425380864>

Physics is white

Prove me wrong

I think that deep seated sexuality probably motivates a lot of human behavior, and human cognition

Lots of physics is jewish

that seems plausible to me

soft sciences aren't science imo

No u

just because it isn't science doesn't mean it can't be right

or on to something

Ok boomer

maybe, but we are using it to get the state to pay for surgeries to cut off dicks

that's not science

that's instanity

Chris you're a Phrenologist...

No I am not

Wtf

Lol

I have told you, it is anthropology

Not phrenology

smdh a phrenologist talking about other things being pseudoscience...

I like that subject

@Nerthulas t. Wants to fuck his mother

Phrenology would still rank above freud lol

@Nerthulas It isn’t phrenology, much of it is still used

First, there is a long logic in all of his activities, hard to survey because of its length, and consequently misleading. He has the ability to extend his will across great stretches of his life and to dispise everything petty about him, including even the flattering and fairest things. Secondly he is colder, harder, less hesistating, and without dear of opinion. He lacks the values that accompany respect and respectability as a whole and all together anything that is part of the virtue of the herd. If he cannot lead, then he will go alone. Third, he wants no at.pathetoc heart, rather tools and servants, I'm his intercourse with man he is always eager to make something of them. He knows he is incommunicable, he finds it tasteless to be familiar or to appear simillar. When not speaking to himself, he wears a mask, he knows it requires more spirit and will to lie than to be truthful.

I'm saying that deep seated sexuality affecting human behavior in non-obvious ways (aka Freud's basic point) is very plausible

@Hamtaro ok boomer

that's all I'm saying

Booma

@Nerthulas t. Boomer

yeah, i honestly never wanted to fuck my mom

and sh'es at least a 7

that's not what I'm saying, there was clearly a lot of baseless speculation on his part

Didn't freud and jung have a falling out? Can't remember what it was though