I don't know what point this guy don't believe in evolution

that could fertilaze the soil very well

but fathers are more like sons than some random person

keep selectively breed

With the alt-hype , the studies he cites cannot be used to justify pre-existing categories. they can only describe the differences between the already identified categories, and frequently in these studies the low genetic differentiation and lack of isolation between subspecies is used to argue that the subspecies are invalid units for the system (fst for example)

and you end up with divergent populations..

repeat, that's race..

nerthulas cooms to levant pus

"I don't know what point this guy don't believe in evolution"

lol

I don't know exactly what you were arguing with MMW, so you should tell that to him

mods please take debates into the <#634548436280016906> room

lol, the fact that you even have two categories to begin with

should tell you everything

<:REEEE:640033860067000350> quit shitting up general

<:REEEE:640033860067000350>

the groups are already chosen

lol, pretending we don't have groups is silly

what does that even mean 'justify pre-existing categories'

you are already using them..

I am addicted

they don't need to be 'justified'

they emerged naturally

if they weren't valid, you couldn't be

they are confirmed as being distinct in significant ways by further study, but it was already something that everybody knew

we're talking about a difference, blond and black hair are not the same

>shitting up general

what else is going on in general

you can group it as you want, and we already ahve groups

right now

lol

easily recognizeable

clearly there are groups, and clearly there are genetic differences between them

what more do you want

@Nerthulas categories not substantiated in the studies. for example, comparing human fst to the fst of different subspecies like wolves, zebras, buffalo, etc.

"you can't group them" clearly we can

what about it?

all they're saying is that ***if*** fst were to be accepted as a standard for the presence of subspecies classification, then humans would meet that standard

its not a complicated argument

like 80% of the genes are for our brains, think about that

just think abou tit

if we can sperate by the exterior