that's not how race really works, races are not equal to subspecies except insofar as they are classifications 'below the species level'

it's groups isolated for some time, developing certain traits common (or more common) to them, divergent from other groups

in that sense they are subspecies, but that isn't really how the word is used

that's race

that's how we do it with other animals

so we clearly ahve races

the amount doesn't even matter tbh

they just don't like the word

we have the groups

@Banjod We classify different animals in accordance to their genetic difference between populations.

that's one thing

and we can use them

@Yek NO

no we don't

a small difference in genes for the brain makes a big difference

any leftist must know that

if that were true then fst would be regularly associated with subspecies number but it isn't

so that's not what's going on

social constructs, are social constructs! <:horrified:603092309307031560>

I like my mutt dog

the groups are valid because we can recognize them

it's really that simple

he has no balls though

they don't get that its actually ***impossible*** conceptually for us to be wrong

its not even a matter of this or another study

that only relates to the degree

"the groups are valid because we can recognize them"

So they're determined via what? Phenotypical traits?

for example

@Yek is a communism saw him on a communism server very likely antifa

so he won't further fuck up the dog breeds

@deleted account not communist

yes u r

no u

no

no u

we know the frequency genes occur in races

im a campus conservative

if they cluster, that can be a race

afro-latino

@Banjod Clusters arent race.

first of all, in the idea of race, race is not one level of classification, you can think of different levels