it is beneficial long term

population growth is harmful long term

you can't just mix people up and expect them to have the same level of social cohesion

not all mixing is even equal

peoples and nations are a process and cyclical. You can't just freeze your favorite moment of one

only in martial competition with other nations is it 'harmful'

this is such spergery

how is masses of people in europe good when we have automation?

Drug enhanced

I don't place myself as outside the process of history @Eternal Entropy you are doing so when you say such a thing

YOU

are the sperg...

I say this because people speak in these terms

i dont think eternal was implying that

I don't know if this is just a troll name or what

I also was not speaking to you. Chill out bruv

@James Peterson lmao, what happens when they age too?

what happens after the new arrivals age, and have low birth rates?

@James Peterson but in a 1st world economy, most of the real wealth is in capital and infrastructure, so it really doesn't matter, since people don't produce anything

they produce services for other people

after those immigrants?

@James Peterson no

you're draining them

they will have lower iq children in the countries you drained

you wont just have an endless supply of immigrants when every immigrant population has low birthrates

high IQ countries don't have high birth rates

yes banjod is correct here

china won't have enough people eventually

japan don't have

taking their best is making everything worse

where exactly are these people coming from?

the major assets (land, capital, and infrastructure) are relatively static - therefore the fewer people in the country, the greater the general welfare

and why would they want to come to a mixed hellhole?

ahhhhhhhh

hapa coutnries aren't good

yep, that's another question: where will the people come from

high iq countries have low birth rates