Message from @blanc
Discord ID: 648206244103847947
imperator optimates wanted to stop generals from controlling too many soldiers
at once
Optimate! Quomodo te habes!
because it concentrate power
Gabinius only had 2 legions though
and he was all the way in Syria
salve patrician
Salve!
more than one is too many for some
Indeed
Too many
was he in syria
interesting
That should have been a rule
Less civil wars
:/
Gabinius was governor of Syria
and he was ordered by Pompey to invade Egypt
Who was gabinius
and Cato and the Optimates opposed it
Not every expansion is a good expansion given the time
Yes!
Aulus Gabinius was a Roman senator who was appointed Governor of Syria
Deciding what to conquer was a VERY complicates shit, return of investment kinda shit
around the time that Caesar was in Gaul, Gabinius was putting down revolts in Judea
and also invaded Egypt when Ptolemy XII was overthrown by his daughter
he also attempted to intervene in a Parthian succession war
Scotland was decided not worth it, even tho they DID conquer it they left cause of that
anyway my point is none of those were wars of expansionism
can't get involved in every single conflict, sending romans off to die
Jews should have been purged like the britons
Gabinius had to go into Egypt to put Ptolemy XII back into power in order to secure the grain supply
Or sabinians
which Cato and Cicero opposed
Fuckers
and which Pompey ordered in the first place
regardless, to say Optimates opposed all expansion is absurd
and then Cato and Cicero tried to prosecute Gabinius
in about 5 I've gotta meet contractors
but Caesar ordered Cicero to be the defense attorney of Gabinius