That it's unlikely that extraversion is definitively tied to intelligence.

What is your position?

there's certainly no evidence for it

whether its likely or unlikely

There's 118 schoolgirls in a tengentially related study.

There's that.

> The correlation matrix presented in Table 1 shows that there
was a positive correlation between performance on the three
tests—and between the tests and the MidYIS scores—our
proxy for IQ. However, there was also an unexpected positive
correlation between extraversion, performance on the three
tests and MidYIS.

lol

proof of my chess rating https://gyazo.com/3d99288b476ca27af40523622ff2b195?token=2d5c99ce932d2b4767cd14e064eaea4e

that's not evidence

You should smash IQ tests with a rock & reproduce with those schoolgirls

it is <:dab:395562678153904128>

NO E THOTS! NEVER E THOTS! @Deleted User

whats highest

They still produced results saying that IQ and extroversion are correlated. Read the results.

no egirls

hecotr

not even once

did u start an acc on lichess yet

using a proxy and a sample size of 118 student females

@Hector Given that both extraversion and intelligence are very vague concepts, it wouldn't exactly be a challenge to pick apart metrics attempting to quantify either, as being subjective and potentially misleading.

<:Nick:647019355422588958>

so i'm gonna basically reject that out of hand

This is why this is mostly vain and a special olympics discipline.

as not being real evidence

lol

@The Great One I put it off because I couldn't get into my old account and use my name, HeirofTroy

I have an acc on lichess I made just so I could spam a chess tournaments chatroom

You can't tack a hard quantifier on either sociability or intellect.

That's the issue proper IQ tests have,even.

This is a big reason I'm not very enthusiastic about academia

make new one

lol

why

and to use a study with a small sample size of a specific population to say that there is a link?

If you have a cardiology study with n=130,000

@Aqua at this point, you are hopping around the question. Do you have an evidence for your hypothesis?

it still exist

I'll take it

as moderately reliable

i think