Not made

exactly

some people like Gerald Bull for example were not geniuses, but attained vast amounts of experience in their field

and were able to advance, in this case ballistics

You also have to be a little psycho

Is that Alex Jones

i am

and engineering

I'm not sure how much science is advanced by raw genius so much as tedious shit

hmmm Gerald Bull got assasinated

The theoretical groundwork is probably mostly g

Get in the car we are gonna fight the globalists

By the mossad actually

https://tenor.com/view/ryan-reynolds-what-are-you-sure-really-confused-gif-15672393

if I spend enough time on certain problems I can find creative solutions to them

I don't consider myself to be a genius

I don't think its Alex Jones

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/647184565387001871/653417864317108225/8047061_FullSizeRe_305bc0f5186d4d343fcff9db65ada5c6.png nerth dox

I do have a lot of experiential knowledge and database to draw on and I'm allowed to have a ton of time

Like look at the shit Stephan Hawking was doing before he died
Essentially making shit up
But I wouldn't be surprised if he was on the right path

Stephen Hawking also had a ton of time, if you look at stephen hawking's earlier career it was actually somewhat unremarkable

stephen hawking was short

RIP

Stephen Hawking is burning in Hell

oof

Also true

But he was a genius

https://youtu.be/91CnOAlYTRA

lol

That pit fiend is kinda thicc

@Yek https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498939/

Mari = ubermensch

Joe's trad-cath egalitarianism showing through

arent bonobos the ones that have polyamorous relationships?

if you put enough monkeys in front of a keyboard they'll eventually produce shakespeare

>abs showing
>thicc
what did he mean by this?

what kind of shakesspeare

Yes bonobos are matriarchal

this comparison to bonobos makes a lot of sense actually

Also our closest relatives