That's what a state is
Atleast in it's initial stages
We seek protection and pay for it with freedoms

It will not be centralized monopolistic force

no

Why go through all this trouble when Western states could just you know

there still needs to be organization otherwise you have basket ball americandom

its the monopolistic agent of force

Stop listening to Jews

Hah

why would they

You gonna pay them through taxes either way

Arab states don't listen to Jews

<:enoch:639985589625552912>

So clearly it's not just about states

Except saudis allied with Israel..

Big brained

house of saud

There has to be a monopoly
Unless you are proposing a non-autocratic one

No

i hear they may be the richest family in the world

monopoly leads to degeneration

Force can only exist as a monopoly

it always does, thats why the state devolves

Wrong

Explain

A monopoly of force will simply multiply to infinity

the civil war was the worse thing that happened to american unitl WW2

Its to the benefit of the state that they agress morw

and of course, the other obvious problems

Monopoly and force are synonymous

because of the civil ware

Force may be used to uphold monopoñy

Are they same? no

it set presedence for the lessening of state rights

due to the outcome

We can have decentralized force

yeah

we can

Where each property owner is a locus of power

but you know who can't

Force can only be top down , no?
ie a monopoly

you know the problem in