Scandis are all soulless and Godless I don't blame Banjod for being like this

well maybe it was written when it did exist

right?

i'm not soulless or godless, i'm just honest

you are soulless, indeed

Can we really ever know?

and they used this name to describe the place commonly known as

@Eternal Entropy yes, because it was written hundreds of years later

not hundreds

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/489806513393762304/653626753683816468/c7c3yegnce341.jpg

@Weaboo Kempeitai

oldest manuscripts are about 75 to 100 years after christ's death

there existed this magic jew 2000 years ago

I read it in a book

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

my parents told me

so it must be true

@Epic Style You still don't understand nihilism.

ok retard

@Eternal Entropy i'm going by what what's his name said

it's just so fking stupid

Morals are subjective preferences. You cannot disprove this.

like come on

just come on

Not all subjective preferences should be respected. Yes.

But that changes nothing.

About the nature of morality.

if you think morals are subjective preferences, then you don't understand what is good

or what god would want

Morality comes from man, and man alone.

This is why religion and morals come from God

discovering is not the same as inventing

man with his ego will endlessly debate these things never getting anywhere

It may well be a product or our biology, perhaps intended by God, perhaps not.

and it's not the same as subjective

Believing in subjective morality without God is still less illogical than thinking you can prove objective morality without God

Yes

and since man is not universal, no morals will be found as such

When did I assert objective morality?

I didnt

Banjod does

Perhaps not.