@Weaboo Kempeitai that would still imply biological wiring, and biological components are not a valid foundation for morality
evolution is arbitrary
Some ideas are just too difficult to articulate without misrepresenting them.
I think biology can explain morality.
then it's a shitty idea
Biology can explain subjective morality
but not objective morality
Yes, there is no objective morality. It seems like Banjod is wrong there.
my subjective morality is the objective reality
😤
lol
the problem comes from thinking you should invent them
or that god has them
it's if god was real
waht would he do
Subjective morals can be explained by evolution but there is no morality that exists independent of our minds. I don't see it.
morals comes from teh best results
biology can explain it's imperatives and emergent functions. This you can make arguments for dogmatic morals but it can't be used to prove or justify universal morality
that's how tou discover them
Genes, basically. It's all about making the best society to coom.
To coom in girl and make many babies
@Banjod mate that's literally just utilitarianism
lol no
yup
What are the best results?
if you think you've found something groundbreaking youre dead wron
g
it is though
The ones that provide psychic pleasure to the majority of people?
lmao
principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior.
epic style
if you think I take christcucks seriously
you are dead wrong
like
you have proven yourself unable to think
Ok retard
always get salty when someone points out you are a brainlet
why do you believe this banjod?
believe what
