lmfao

we cna prove this with atom decay

@ghj Ultimately, it's about the unreality of the past.

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

<:pepelaugh:640412982119235596>

<:pepekek:649611550809653248>

what the hell does that mean

imagine

the past is real

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

people sitting here trying to argue

there was a magic jew

2k years ago

there was

MAGIC JOO

there are historical records of jesus

the past is a fed

and expecrting people to take it seriously

The gotcha of the Omphalos Hypothesis is that thanks to the problem of induction, you can't actually tell if the world is as old as it seems, or if it was artificed that way.

✨ <:kraut:389881471881576448> ✨

As in, created to look older than it was.

jesus existed, no historian disputes htis

Discord atheists do

yes some do

dispute it

they do.

lol

what is the omphalos hypothesis aqua?

I'd jump into this convo but something literally just popped up

>As in, created to look older than it was.

oh

like, why would you expect anyone to take you seriouslywhen you say shit like this

its not *mainstream* to dispute it

but it isn't crackpot

either

@ghj That the world may have been created much more recently than empirical evidence suggests, because that evidence's origin is unknown. It may have been artificed.

but romans have records banjod

they wrote about his trial

lol

no roman records of a Jesus exist

EVERYWHERE I GO
I MUST LOL