Message from @Nerthulas
Discord ID: 658079618296971274
tho maybe there is research on this
but
blue eyes are the exception, not the rule
its not as clear as youd think
it is coded for by way more alleles than eye color is
theres still lots of genes for eye color
yeah
that's true Fugue
23andme think i should have dark eyes
@Nerthulas so people who say dark skin is dominant can’t be sure of that?
the dominant/recessive thing for eyes was really based on observation of reproduction before it was based on knowledge of the genes
White and black are rather pure colors
so Fugue is right
when your're dealing with thousands of genes, we're talking about degrees of dominance and in which direction
its not strictly Mendelian
Deviating from them is easy
but
Mendelian
.... MANDOLORIAN
I think a new one is out?
which would indicate to me that there is a greater tendency for a 'median' between parental traits
Ok that’s what I was thinking
since its averaged out over more gene locations
Thank you, Nerthoid... I was beginning to think I was the “human bonds” guy.. I thought my point was articulated 😬
lol, JF didn't get it the way you were putting it, or he's tired
ultimately idk the exact answer, I'm not even sure that there's that much research on it
but
there are more gene locations
so its probably more averaged out
as a median between the two
as compared to eye color
Mixed race couple?
CRINGEEEE
the name is bond, human bond
lmfao i thought the exact same thing when i heard it ^
any human bonds for sale?
this could be the next bitcoin i want to get in on the ground floor
all i could think of the human bond guy was that nobody would want to buy black people's bonds or theyd have negative value due to crime, and then the government would dismantle the human bond schema because it was racist
@Nerthulas what do you mean by “more gene locations”? I haven’t heard this before
unfortunately the inventor suffered a public intellectual execution by noted scientist Jean-Francois Gariepy yesterday