Message from @La Fin du Monde
Discord ID: 658895755259543552
They're not listening
Maybe nobody is really listening to pretty women either tho.....
I just think "natural" sexual relationships can be supplanted in a more effective way via some type of technology
to be honest.. I dont think the sluts appear to be horrible people
I think they appear to be kind and normal
like everyone else.
I think the sexually active people appear to have healthy sexual and non
sexual relationships.
and it could potentially be liberated if we could engineer those motivations out of humanity. I think viewing sex as purely hedonistic would be very toxic for society
I think hedonism is misunderstood.
well, loyal married men realize how little they care to talk to women lol
I dont have any right to advocate for hedonism
because I dont have sex.
But I dont think the drive for pleasure
is what makes people lazy
Why don't you have sex?
sure, the carrot just needs to be in the right direction. The right societal structures need to be in place
,,,if you are actually talking about hedonism..
Most hedonistic societies where monogamious..
they had sex with one person but liked porn..alot
Not Rome
At least, at the end
I have problems accepting pleasure for pleasures sake. It should be a motivator for a higher state of personal/societal being
Rome was not a hedonistic society.
Sex isn't for pleasure's sake. Babies are time consuming.
There was a hedonist philosopher who married
his sex slave.
What do you consider to be a "hedonistic society" than?
a society which is open about sex and information
about how to make sex to give more pleasure
I think a lot of philosophers talk the talk, but don't walk the walk. You can say you live for pleasure only, all day long. Doesn't mean anything
Societies with instruction manuals for sex
and where they talk about how to do it...
India
But I don't think they're hedonistic.
India was monogamious
I'd consider a hedonistic society to be one that has structures of motivation that guide people/society to lower states of being
Not in the north
well... the hedonistic books are assuming martial relationship
philosophers are cope
people should be open about sex and pleasure.
Are they? I don't think they are.
yes lol
they kind of are but oh well lol
easy mode believe in a higher power
it is good up to a point
No, I didn't mean philosophers. I meant the books from India
India was a complex society.
The upper class had sex pallaces..
but most people only had sex with one person.
hardmode cope so hard you meme a how set of laws about naps
But that negates your hypothesis, @virtue
lol
The hindus did build the same sex hareems as found all over the world.