the chat the last few 30 mins been

Nietzsche and Wittgenstein are the last intelligent philosophers

Aquinas was a brainlet

There are other mundane ways to draw out reincarnation @Fellow Comrade

the memories die when the structure of the brain is decayed. everything fades to black.

I haven't really studied Aquinas in depth, only a cursory look

You don't know that

waut

but none of it really seems interesting...

what are his best arguments?

discord blog uses claps instead of likes?

these queers...

All the arguments for god and afterlife are those of a scared child

It’s weakness

intellectual

<:tiptip:462282246695419934>

Cringe

Big tough materialist reductionist

blah blah

other "reincarnations" are from like genes shared through the generations or whatever. like instinctual behaviours passed down.

It's dick stroking

gay

denying the existence of god is weakness, you just don't want to be held accountable for your sins

You don't realize you setup a nihilism that leads to destruction, on the one hand

God created humans with brains so they could live as slaves and have to trust a 2000 year old desert story

i can't believe some people think they become a butterfly with their memories still intact. lol

To globo-homo as palliative for nihilism on the other

The fact is we only know percepts via consciousness

I have no sins

if religionists want to argue, they need to argue as if their beliefs were not implicitly or obviously true...

Consciousness remains the ground

the default should be that random claims which are not at all obvious are not true

So you can't have certain knowledge about materialist reductionism being the one and only etc

without some arguments

if some monk who lived 800 years ago could figure it out, you can too

ok what did he figure out

what were his best arguments

you stand no chance goy, theres like 4 fedoras active rn

God was the first mover

QED god exists

oh that argument lol