The fact is we only know percepts via consciousness

I have no sins

if religionists want to argue, they need to argue as if their beliefs were not implicitly or obviously true...

Consciousness remains the ground

the default should be that random claims which are not at all obvious are not true

So you can't have certain knowledge about materialist reductionism being the one and only etc

without some arguments

if some monk who lived 800 years ago could figure it out, you can too

ok what did he figure out

what were his best arguments

you stand no chance goy, theres like 4 fedoras active rn

God was the first mover

QED god exists

oh that argument lol

the five ways

yes

Lmao

they gonna gang up

gl

Santa was the first mover

Therefore Santa exists

What if Santa is just another name for God

Nominalism is nothing

santa is black, he sneaks around at night and bangs a thick white woman.

all I see from religionists is shit talking and memes

Your eventual fate.

because you've never investigated the claims

look into the supposedly terrible argument from motion

yum, i haven't eaten lambs brain for a while.

lamb brains

<:ew:651262076383264788>

Not from Eastern monistic traditions, Nerth

I think that some of the prior categories of our thought are probably emergent phenomena which our minds have evolved to think in, but which may not be basic

i wanna try eating whale before it's illegal everywhere.

I've eaten whale in Japan

i heard it's really fishy and tastes like the ocean lol was it good?

our minds evolved at a certain level of complexity, and so operate on some level taking emergent phenomena as being basic, when they may not be at all

it's super red, and really soft flesh..

wasn't expecting it to be super red tbh.

Happy Epiphany fellas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphany_(holiday)

I had whale sushi,
it didn't particularly taste like the sea or anything