You could argue with close kin you’re better off working together even if your kin has 4 children and you have 1, that’s actually better for your genes as a whole than if you had say 2-3 kids

And the other had 0

Group selection is super vast

Culture, ethnicity, ideologue, and etc. are group selected for.

The value of the his group approach falls off exponentially as genetic distance and group size increases

Soldiers, termites, and otters all use a different type of group selection.

in the end, there's not exactly one mechanism, but only a theoretical construct and a probability

99.999% of termites DO NOT mate themselves. But they all protect the queen and replicate through her. Millions of ants protecting one queen.

and that might be, why objects and mechanism are the domain of rope theorists

And you get massive fitness pay offs for it. One ant on its own is worthless. But they are super complex as a super organism and are tuned to be optimized.

@TuerSchlossEnteiser i am going to be honest, the rope theory of light seems to be cope to me

and?

ants are literally the opposite of a good group selection example

nope

pros use bees

Nah, pros would actually use termites.

I just forgot. But I did mention it earlier. but they all make the same point.

@Nerthulas did you see all I wrote? Did we get anywhere?

no

no

no

ur a sperg and group selection has no value

Spergor

I am not a sperg. Unironically, I can't wait until all the shit posters and spergs get finished selected against.

finished selected?

by what means, group or individual selection?

That way we can have a cooperative n pro social society again.

Individual selection mostly

:p

my-bare-hands selection

We are pretty pro social

Irl pro social

I mean we

Not social online

you goyim can go kill each other

(((we)))

Why would she care

I call it the day of sperg, when there will be no more spergs and shit posters left, due to them being selected against

This is what women want.