thats a good one

"i heard about aristotle so yeah that mean good"

nah I read Aristotle

Aristotles actually lived under a philosopher king..
he was the real shit

Plato's The Republic kinda makes sense but overall is just really dumb

Philosophy is usefull...

why bother talking about a perfect Republic?

just have a monarchy

I’m Aristotelian

I read some pretty usefull philosophy in university

and not a shitty plutocrat urbancuck monarchy

we do not want to shot philosophy

I also Aristotelian

we want to shot philosophers

but like a really useful monarchy like the one they had in Makedonia

important difference

@TuerSchlossEnteiser
YESS

Brb again my client is phoning

First of all Aristotle continued the teachings of Plato in many ways and he was one of the first people to distinguish being and potentiality. Plato was extremely influenced by his teacher Socrates who was the first denialer

..we need a new generation of philosophers..
with an aim to REALITY

of order

got lucky, seems like I picked the right Scruton

And who was the starter of decadence in the west

Aristotles saved Platos ideas.. its he logical conclusion.

https://youtu.be/1eD9RDTl6tM?t=339

Plato couldn't explain basic iron smithing..
Aristotles could

agree, without German people fail at German ideas, horribly

Aristotle saved Plato, yes

"eeeh muh science and evolushion - philo useless cuz i have no clue about how to strcuture my worldviews"

look socialist failures all around the globe

without Aristotle then Plato would be a meme

Aristoteles explained how to create and organize
do usefull things with real things...

makes total sense what scruton says

@virtue Implying that this wasn't common to human nature in general

Plato could only explain moral philosophy.
Plato even avoided practical or technical issues

your introspective worldviews come from how well-of your ancestors were in having them

the only things that Aristotle was good for was his contributions to epistomology and the law of noncontradiction

it's not by reason that you v. asians v. africans (even high iq africans) come to completely different conclusions about ideal organizations

I mean, how huge the gap is, when a language is changed, is easy demonstrate by anglos love nietzsche in all his shiny endless stupidity and idiotic Calender Motti people hurl around as if they were of any value (which they are not)

(if it were by reason it would all be the same? and to the extent that it can you are no longer expressing preferences but methodology)