so why abide by their definitions then?

That definition is useless

They dont use racist against the South African black majority

that have the power in that country

even as they attack whites and call for their deaths

therefor, the leftist shielding behind their definition too is false

Steelman defeated

I am not, I am just trying to explain that when liberals say one cannot be racist against whites, they don't mean, as many people on the right erroneously believe, that one cannot be bigoted along racial lines against whites

Even if you steelman you can defeat it

aka take their stupid definition seriously

yes they do

poland is over

and yes they do

they create an "unwinnable condition"

they absolutely mean you cant be bigoted against whites

well

its not unwinnable condition

its a condition that once met

Wasn't the whole south africa thing originally a cecil rhodes "campaign" so to speak? yet not him or the jews that funded him get any flak

whites are doomed

it's their doublethink, their doublespeak

once whites lose power they are dead

What do you guys think? This person is a white south african

is it a femoid

u say u hate liberals, yet you don't have the foggiest idea of how they run their games

Yes @Chawosaurian

if its a femoid

dismiss

a white person says X - all others are wrong

femoids will get raped in the ass and still try to say everythings fine if its blacks doing it to them

sometimes literally kek

that's what got us here

how do we know he's really white?

he or she

and south african

whatever

@Chawosaurian most based comment I heard today

exactly, good point