Message from @ππππππππππππππππ
Discord ID: 674428396251381762
That's pretty good too
A guy once asked me for the difference between Hayek, Mises, and Rothbard
I said βthe age of consentβ
Solid
why does the tip of the triangle get liberty
but non of the other tips
It was to make 4 points of opposition: egalitarianism v darwinism : liberty v order
I could remove it but I would have to change "orders" font size.
Aesthetics are everything
what is egalitarian and ordered and opposed to darwinism
what is ordered and darwin but opposed to egalitarian
Absolutism
another label
like how you labeled anarchism liberty
Well it is the ultimate form of freedom. It just also happens to be retarded
I suppose there could be another set of labels for the poles: Individualism/Collectivism/Traditionalism
But idk alot of other ideologies besides the socialist ones can be said to be collectivist
because without the law it is not conducive to economic activity
Not conducive =/= infringement. From a legal and political perspective lack of law will always be more free than law
how do you organize a society based on anarchy anyways
is it illegal to have laws
A society based on anarchy would essentially not even have the political infrastructure to have laws
but people can make their own local laws
or no
Thats why anarchism is stupid. When you remove the state people will in micro, remake the state
not the state
just law
You cant have laws without some form of proto state.
yes you can all you need is a court and a police force
and a prison
Eventually those little communities will out of self interest come together and you will have a big state again
Its not a stable form of existance
Anarchy is the worst political philosophy the only one I think might work is primitivism and thatβs only because cave men did it
kek
anarchy is an interesting concept but it makes no sense in terms of nature
it is counter-intuitive
Thereβs probably a hundred different versions of anarchism