Message from @Dang_Isaiah
Discord ID: 580181217161510942
But again, wait confirmation
Thats what im asking rn
lmao
UGH
Ask the ortho guy
Here
Got it
am do
Prayer to the Father
2664 There is no other way of Christian prayer than Christ. Whether our prayer is communal or personal, vocal or interior, it has access to the Father only if we pray "in the name" of Jesus. The sacred humanity of Jesus is therefore the way by which the Holy Spirit teaches us to pray to God our Father.
So yes you are right
Not in the wat you worded it
But I got it
Also
The prayer of the Church, nourished by the Word of God and the celebration of the liturgy, teaches us to pray to the Lord Jesus. Even though her prayer is addressed above all to the Father, it includes in all the liturgical traditions forms of prayer addressed to Christ. Certain psalms, given their use in the Prayer of the Church, and the New Testament place on our lips and engrave in our hearts prayer to Christ in the form of invocations: Son of God, Word of God, Lord, Savior, Lamb of God, King, Beloved Son, Son of the Virgin, Good Shepherd, our Life, our Light, our Hope, our Resurrection, Friend of mankind. .
Hope that helped
internet is back btw
Thanks
I got food
I got a big ol meal to down before I say anything
Corn cherries mac n cheese n baked chicken with some bbq sauce
1 god three persons boys .
not hard
each person is different, tho each is Gof
*God
yeah but muslims can't just read that and understand it
^^^^^
“1+1+1=3 omg why cant christians understand!!!???”
the fools
They all speak sand language they cant understand english translated from greek n Hebrew n all the stuff
its 1x1x1=1
simple maths
truuu
@MawLr @LuxCo “The Christian canon of Scripture wasn't canonized (the New Testament as such becoming what it is today) til the year 367, after the Church survived intermittent persecution under the Jews and especially pagan Romans and had, from 313, become a licit, legal religion when the first Christian emperor legalized it. In 367, the Church council at the time, sitting under the rule of a Christian emperor , took the opportunity right after the death of Julian the Apostate (a Roman emperor who reigned only 3 years, was raised Christian, but left it and returned to paganism, tried to create a pagan Church, etc). So if a guy lived on the earth for 30-32 years, had been born 1652, disappeared/died in 1682-85, and hundreds, if not thousands, of different accounts were written about his life and teachings, would you trust a group that in 2019, almost 350 years later, claimed to have the only true sources about him? This is what Christians have with the Bible. Even the first three books of the 4 main Gospels show Jesus as sort of a demi-god, not quite God but more than a mere prophet. Only the Gospel of John, written the last of the four main Gospels (about 90-110 AC/AD) explicitly states Jesus was divine.”
Muslim nigga^^^^
Jesus wasn't a demigod, Jesus was God incarnate, also, translations like the Septgugiant (or however it's spelled) and such had existed prior to the Council of Carthage, which is the one I presume he is referring to, the gospels, however, were indeed made canon at that era, I don't see why Jesus would fall as a Prophet because the Gospels talk about his miracles too, also, regarding the question of 'a group in 2019 claiming we have the only sources', we don't, these are translations that are kept within the Vatican Codex, to which at one point, were also available for Orthodox alike.
also, one could point out islam is basically deformed gnosticism but I am not well instructed, just don't let them corner you
And ignoring centuries of councils, theologians and wise men alike is just very egotistical and lacks humility
not excuse me because I need to exercise
@Mac tíre iarain Also, Constantine the Great was the one who stopped persecution and adopted Christianity because he literally won because of God's help (In Hoc Signo Vinces), he was the successor of Diocletian, who led the last great Persecution in Rome
at least in full empire
of course