And you can, if you want, go full autism in reasoning an theological analysis, but then I will call you a hypocrite, since you dismiss the deep theological analysis of catholic doctors and saints as silly scholastic and rationalization

😐

Have a rethink of what your last sentence said and what affect it has

You are literally telling me that if I put effort into something in a discussion, you will call me a hypocrite and declare victory

I have no reason to talk with you, now.

Not because you put effort into it

You have given me no possible entry.

Leaven=sin

Now does it make sense

But because you critiqued theologians putting effort into their theolody

It's independent of the discussion at hand

I'm pro effort when it's leading to a deeper understanding of a cohesive picture that's simple to understand.

And what do you think that theology and scholastic is?

I have a *lot* of experience with writing extensively overcomplicated and technically correct things.

Tfw make a rational point and get ignored

I know how flawed it is.

I'm shitposting now

And what you call "rationalization", which doesn't try to infer what has been revealed to make it "rational", but to infer things from them

FILTHPIT FILTHPIT

<:cathokike:291522267890974721>

<:orthokike:291522285020512256>

<:orthokike:291522285020512256> <:orthokike:291522285020512256> <:orthokike:291522285020512256> <:orthokike:291522285020512256> <:orthokike:291522285020512256> <:rubbetirub:492691976081375242>

<:stormfag:509490796203081729> <:stormfag:509490796203081729> <:stormfag:509490796203081729> <:stormfag:509490796203081729> <:stormfag:509490796203081729> <:stormfag:509490796203081729> <:stormfag:509490796203081729> <:stormfag:509490796203081729>

Nice

2 corinthians 5:21

**2 Corinthians 5:21 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**

```Dust


<21> For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. ```

The reason I didn't respond is because I would need to draft an appropriate response to the notion that leaven is sin and that's why it's not in the eucharist

Except the eucharist is meant to bring spiritual perfection and thus must contain no sin symbolic or otherwise

Also fair

I'm not sorry for what I've done

But fair

But that's not necessarily a problem because Christ was made to be sin, explicitly in 2 Corinthians. I need more time to properly write this out

Leavened bread is sinful because you can't imprint fancy patterns on it

Oof

now that's where you're wrong buddy

Show me

Ah, the schism has just been mended

I've never seen a Latin host with any design on it at all 🤔