Message from @JoeyJoestar1337

Discord ID: 640993990904250374


2019-11-04 19:09:20 UTC  

Quick question

2019-11-04 19:09:38 UTC  

Consider a national archive

2019-11-04 19:09:39 UTC  

Yes

2019-11-04 19:12:17 UTC  

If it were to be burnt up. Would to prevent the damages in the future would you have copies of the archive, or a database?

2019-11-04 19:12:50 UTC  

Its gotta be 1 or the other not both

2019-11-04 19:12:54 UTC  

Yes

2019-11-04 19:13:24 UTC  

I’m petty sure they already have a database of all that for that exact reason

2019-11-04 19:14:10 UTC  

Ffs even some of the Vatican’s archives have been made digital

2019-11-04 19:14:33 UTC  

Mainly cause digital is more reliable way of preservation

2019-11-04 19:14:43 UTC  

Well ye, but it's either physical copies only or a database.

2019-11-04 19:14:53 UTC  

Well

2019-11-04 19:15:01 UTC  

They keep the physical originals

2019-11-04 19:15:05 UTC  

And a database

2019-11-04 19:15:23 UTC  

No the choice is either 1 or the other

2019-11-04 19:15:48 UTC  

Oh well I’d say a database

2019-11-04 19:15:59 UTC  

Why?

2019-11-04 19:17:10 UTC  

Much more reliable way of preservation, physical copies are nice but inefficient and more susceptible to loss or destruction and a bitch to organize

2019-11-04 19:19:08 UTC  

An agent with a neodymium magnet or a ballistic country could emp the nation and wipe the electronics tho

2019-11-04 19:19:30 UTC  

An agent could burn down original copies with a match

2019-11-04 19:19:55 UTC  

What’s your point , overall a database is a much safer way and will progressively get safer

2019-11-04 19:21:16 UTC  

Copies are still just copies tho, he burns the copies n we have the originals and create an underground network underneath the warehouses the original documents or another set copies are held, with the true originals somewhere else

2019-11-04 19:21:41 UTC  

I still think a database is easier

2019-11-04 19:21:49 UTC  

We could copy a database so easily

2019-11-04 19:22:05 UTC  

Copying multiple copies physically is way more intensive

2019-11-04 19:22:53 UTC  

A process is a process but when all is said and done a job is done.

2019-11-04 19:23:23 UTC  

Doesn’t change the fact that physical copies are way more inefficient and easier to destroy and lose

2019-11-04 19:23:32 UTC  

Anyways gtg take care Joey

2019-11-04 19:23:45 UTC  

Alrighty bud

2019-11-04 20:15:17 UTC  

A database is terrible for long term storage

2019-11-04 20:17:04 UTC  

First, the physical support can deteriorate. Then the connectors of the storage medium can become obsolete. You need electricity and the correct hardware to read information

2019-11-04 20:17:35 UTC  

A database is good to have, but it must always be backed up by physical copies

2019-11-04 20:45:27 UTC  

Could always do what that one time capsule did

2019-11-04 20:46:45 UTC  

Put tons of data on some kind of engineered diamond disk, then seal it away with a machine that can read it, and all the instructions to build that thing that can read it, including how to gather the materials

2019-11-04 20:49:01 UTC  

Also a good option.

2019-11-04 20:50:31 UTC  

As long as it doesn't need electricit

2019-11-04 20:51:34 UTC  

If I remember correctly it was a self-powering device of some sort, either solar or a basic generator

2019-11-04 20:52:06 UTC  

A lot of those things bank on whatever future society at least having electricity as a baseline

2019-11-04 21:28:23 UTC  

The third option was to house stone tablets of every legislative doctrine lmao

2019-11-04 21:28:40 UTC  

Not that bad of an option, really

2019-11-04 21:28:55 UTC  

And it would be held in storehouses square miles in size

2019-11-04 21:29:04 UTC  

They could nano-engrave it and attach an optical microscope