CI is objectively true and proven

You're a retard that hasn't read the Bible, Canaan was cursed and Canaan didn't go to Africa
CI is we wuz heebrooz larp

The Africans did have kings. They were African kings. But not all Africans were kings.

And Egypt was European at the time. Egyptians were descendants of Ham, but they weren't black. And maybe Canaan didn't go to Africa, but Canaanites did. They and the Nubians are the main historical enemies of Egypt

chinks and nips are from Ham too

Blacks are from Africa

Whether they come from Ham or not doesn't change that

I wouldn't say they're "from Ham," per se. It's not like Noah could give birth to three children of different races with the same mother. The Bible doesn't say whether or not all people on earth are descended from Noah and whether all life was wiped out in the flood. IIRC, it does say nephilim were on earth before the flood and after, but that doesn't say whether they survived or whether more were born.

We do know that ancient Egypt was white, and the Tarim Basin mummies corroborate the stories about the first King of China having a red beard, so there were ancient white civilizations in China and Korea. You've got the white civilizations in the Americas too. The fact that we know they were white areas at one point and have evidence of genocide and mixing with these other races says to me that if there is a curse of ham, it's that whichever survived contact with these other groups miscegenated themselves into extinction

I have to say I'm pretty blackpilled about the censorship crackdown
I don't like Infowars but this zuccening bodes ill

Things are getting so bad I feel like we're already living in dystopia

https://twitter.com/jack/status/1026984242893357056

@Deleted User lmao

Alex won't last long on Twitter when Jack's public justification sounds more like an apology for not having him thrown out already

Man there's people in my year that are engaged and shit and I haven't ever held a girl's hand

Feelsbad.jpg

Does it, though?

The only reason we tend to feel this covetousness is because society has become so focussed on sexuality and romantic love being the be-all and end-all of our interactions with the opposite sex.

Quite a few of my friends have gotten married in the last two years. I do feel left behind a bit, but the appreciation for wholesomeness is greater.

i've been single and celibate for the past 4 years

not sure if i actually don't care anymore or its just a cope

No sense in trying to rationalise it to yourself.

That's woman talk.

i have faith that if God intends for it to happen that it will

and if it doesn't I'll just die in war or become a monk

Be careful that that mindset doesn't lead to passiveness, or else it will indeed never happen.

i've already accepted that possibility

as the reality unless something changes

Slowly redpilling my brother a bit more than he already is

Want to get him reading more.

What classical literature would be ideal for a 15 year old?

Try not to suggest anything Christian, for I know the bullish approach won't work with him.

depends a lot on his tastes to be frank

He seems to be developing that adolescent, 4chan-esque appreciation for military history and the Nazis

hmmmmmmm

try to get him a book by Degrelle

The Eastern Front

for example

The burning souls would be better since it's great aphorisms, but I doubt it is edited in English

_In a laudatory review appearing in an official US Army Department magazine, US Army Brigadier General John C. Bahnsen wrote: "The pace of the writing is fast; the action is graphic, and a warrior can learn things from reading this book. I recommend its reading by students of the art of war. It is well worth the price." _ (about The Eastern Front)

Hi