Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 479418455611670528
That's not exactly an upside.
The Jesuits haven't always been a crappy order, and not all bad priests are Jesuits.
What I love is the neocon damage control saying everything about it is totally fine if you interpret the documents correctly
Wasn't Ignacio de Loyola reprimanded for being a judaizer or something?
Ignatian Spirituality isn't a total loss, but the order as a whole has become compromised.
Also:
Friendly reminder for my European fellows to start going to the gym
Loyola was awesome and the Jesuits used to be one of the best orders in Chirstendom
The enemy within in indeed the most dangerous, but the muslims and other assorted elements of the enemy at the gate are more than ready to fight.
Which is why they needed to be destroyed
@Based Chav We unify through example of defeating the enemy and enforcing the laws of God within our own
You still need to be ready to fight.
hit the gym 6 days a week
rest on the 7th
what's what i do at least
@Deleted User
http://media-downloads.pacourts.us/InterimRedactedReportandResponses.pdf
It's from the grand dury report in Pennsylvania
Read at your own risk
Pretty upsetting
Thanks I will
Better tomorrow
Yeah I had a hard time getting to sleep last night haha, started reading it around 9pm
What case is it about?
Multiple ones, I asked from where the screenshot was he posted
Yeah it's a compilation of abuse reports from all over the dioceses of Pennsylvania. Many of the offending priests are dead now and the cases happened 20+ years ago.
They died by natural causes I assume
I believe so yeah
That's just two of them
but it gives you an overview of the years they served and where
" Terms such as "sick leave" or "health leave" were often
used to reference an absence from ministry related to child sexual abuse. In Graff's case, it was coded as sick leave and retirement. Additionally, child sexual abuse was often minimized with
terms such as familiarity, boundary issues, or inappropriate contact. "
I'm not going to accept the word "White Supremacy" when people talk about politics anymore.
I've concluded that White Supremacy is an oxymoron
White is not an inherently Supremacist Culture
In fact it's one of the few that doesn't take pleasure or see profit in the total subjugation of others.
White also isn't a race
I only accept the term "white nationalism" because I get along better with fellow Japhethites than brown Hamites and Semites
They're a Supremacist culture
African, Indian, Arabic and such
Europeans, Latinos, Japanese and others are not Supremacist by nature which is why we get along
@Byzas "White American" is a race
Generally obviously