A spontaneous musing on pro-choice arguments: The sole ethos of those in the pro-choice camp seems to boil down to the bleating of "My body, my choice". In and of itself, this shifts the moral imperative in the dilemma to "Right is in the hands of ability of those capable of making the choice". In which case, does this make a rapist who is capable of choosing if and who to attack of a higher moral ground than his victim who is not granted a choice in such a crime?
