tell her about the benevolence of monarchies

and about the tyranny of autocrats

I made that long post and all she said was "tld;dr"

I'm hate idiots

Tell her about Cults of Personality

Basically your average people from /pol/. Btw, that name was given to me on that server, not by myself

good guy Arkona has my back

>muslim-maoist
what

Just shit post tier names

These people are from 4chan

Basically democracy doesn't allow for a proper leader to take over, as it is pandering to the lowest common denominator, and by doing so, we're electing 'better looking people' instead of qualified people to the job

example: Trudeau, Obama

Those guys sound like glue eaters

@Mr. Byzantium It is not a king that has put a gun to our heads, telling us to praise homosexuality, orgies, feminism, atheism, abortion, etc.

It is not a king that has glorified every single vice

It is not a king that has declared anything that opposes leftist insanity "hate speech" that must be stopped

True. But it is imaginable for a king to do so.

The current reality isn't something "imaginable"

Christianity has thrived under the EBIL kings, while democracy has almost murdered it

The mob is perverse, retarded, nothing good comes from it

Imagine if one of the individuals in that mob became a king.

A king is not a traditionalist by virtue of his being a king.

I already said this some time ago, yet some people don't catch it

If the probabilityof a person being wise is 10% and we assume that a monarch is just as likely, the probability of the monarch being wise is 10%

The probability of the majority being wise is 0%

A king, by virtue of being king, is much more likely to implement virtue and tradition, that is why, as I said, while Christianity has flourished under kings, it has been trampled by democracies

He is more likely to, yes, but it is not a given.

Sure, in the current rot, where people are retards, even a suddenly selected kind would probably be terrible

Yet that wouldn't imply any change with respect to the current situation

At worst it paves the way

The very fact that someone isn't subject to the whims of the mob already makes him less likely to be influenced

The problem is almost nobody, nowadays, would be willing to be a monarch

Because everyone is a cuck for democracy

I would not be willing to be a monarch. Even though I agree that it is far preferable to what we currently suffer, I don't think I could handle it well at all.

I don’t think I deserve to be a monarch.

But most people wouldn't reject the idea out of fear of not being up to the task, but because they hate monarchy. They hate anything beyond the hedonsitic mob

Democracy by the reality that it is unsustainable due to the debt it has created through its acceptance of usury will naturally crumble eventually

It has nothing to do with money

It will crumble through hedonism and tolerance

I pray earnestly that I will be able to be a priest in Japan that way I can be a minor part to get a potential ball rolling for a Christian monarchy since the monarchal foundation is all ready planted and the country isn’t nearly as corrupted by social justice depravity like the West.

If the West is to fall, perhaps through providence God will lift up godly men in Asia to take charge