@Mr. Byzantium he's probably at work rn so message him privately and he'll get back with you

@Arkona 92 What do you think?

I think it's decent

though I don't know if you're arguing irl or on a political discord

Political discord in the Christianity text channel

Some atheist Arab thot that lives in the UK was stating how much of a cuck I am

I'm so frustrated

Very angry

And of course other idiot men side with her

she's calling you a cuck for not believing in democracy?

Yes, because supposedly I'm handing over my rights to a tyrant king

tell her about the benevolence of monarchies

and about the tyranny of autocrats

I made that long post and all she said was "tld;dr"

I'm hate idiots

Tell her about Cults of Personality

Basically your average people from /pol/. Btw, that name was given to me on that server, not by myself

good guy Arkona has my back

>muslim-maoist
what

Just shit post tier names

These people are from 4chan

Basically democracy doesn't allow for a proper leader to take over, as it is pandering to the lowest common denominator, and by doing so, we're electing 'better looking people' instead of qualified people to the job

example: Trudeau, Obama

Those guys sound like glue eaters

@Mr. Byzantium It is not a king that has put a gun to our heads, telling us to praise homosexuality, orgies, feminism, atheism, abortion, etc.

It is not a king that has glorified every single vice

It is not a king that has declared anything that opposes leftist insanity "hate speech" that must be stopped

True. But it is imaginable for a king to do so.

The current reality isn't something "imaginable"

Christianity has thrived under the EBIL kings, while democracy has almost murdered it

The mob is perverse, retarded, nothing good comes from it

Imagine if one of the individuals in that mob became a king.

A king is not a traditionalist by virtue of his being a king.

I already said this some time ago, yet some people don't catch it

If the probabilityof a person being wise is 10% and we assume that a monarch is just as likely, the probability of the monarch being wise is 10%

The probability of the majority being wise is 0%

A king, by virtue of being king, is much more likely to implement virtue and tradition, that is why, as I said, while Christianity has flourished under kings, it has been trampled by democracies

He is more likely to, yes, but it is not a given.

Sure, in the current rot, where people are retards, even a suddenly selected kind would probably be terrible

Yet that wouldn't imply any change with respect to the current situation

At worst it paves the way