<:GWchadThinkeyes:366999794117246976>

pic when I attended at Russian Orthodox Church at Seoul in last week(The pic is part of Russian parish korean fb page)

pic when I attended at Russian Orthodox Church at Seoul in last sunday(The pic is part of Russian parish korean fb page)

https://www.facebook.com/orthodoxchurchinseoul/
Korean page of Russian Orthodox church at Seoul(Moscow restarts the mission in Korea on January 2019)

https://www.facebook.com/OrthodoxChurchSeoul/
English/Russian Page

Also They provide Free russian course for Non-russians after the Divine liturgy and friendship.

Bless up

Cause Korean prots are especially nasty

@Daniil Yeah Korean prots are really cancerous. The Prots cut themselves from the spirituality of Desert fathers and Church fathers, Apostolic Tradition. And They interpret biblical phrases on their mind so heresies are arose from the pillar of the Protestantism.

I enlisted to the Russian Course and The Russian parish(I switched my parish from EP to MP) asked for picking christian name

I picked Leo from St.Leo the Great

@Daniil You can also find the icon of Tsar Nicholas II and his family behind on the pic.

And I'm also on the catechumen group chat in Kakaotalk for Korean Russian Orthodox parishioners.

Nice. Best of luck in begoming

Lol kakaotalk

Thats how you know you are Korean

@Mr. Byzantium Why does it have to have gluten in it?

Also, I have medical publications and my lab peer reviews people too. What's sad is that a lot of studies get passed that just suck.

My dad is a surgeon and they have monthly journal club where they all just go through new papers in surgery stuff and they just tear them apart. So many are garbage

@Mozalbete ⳩ What's insane though is that the high IR journals will turn you down for the smallest stuff sometimes. Your whole study will be good but they'll ask you to reverify your data a 4th or 5th way even though you've already verified it with 3 different methods.

I'm in the BR field FYI.

They will turn you down for things that do not matter at all, but the unpaid reviewer are not going to replicate what you do or say.

I work on comuter science

Oh yeah, I do reviews lol. We don't check their actual work per se.

We go through the whole paper and send it back and tell them how garbage it is though

One recently didn't have a control group lol

I was baffled

It was also littered with grammar issues (came from China)

Anyone with half a brain can just mention a million methodologies that weren't actually used, or "ignore outliers", or use convenient statistical emthods, etc

Chinese people are that way

Yeah, it's pretty awful at times.

https://youtu.be/3QmkHr0W5Vk

Peak example

Wait, wrong one I think. Right topic, but wrong video to explain it

Got my first warning from Big Zucc, lads.

Feel like I'm one of the cool kids now.

https://youtu.be/yTTaXqVEGkU

There's the right one

Le sciencitif concensus face

Recently, my team started working on a CS field. We tested an existing technique, using the very implementation that the author provided and the same data

The results were much, much worse than those reported in the paper. The paper has several hundred citations