I believe in Neo-Feudalism

Where Dukes govern land but don't own it

and it's possible for a peasant to become a noble via public service

Isn't that strictly speaking more of an imperial beaurocracy rather than neo-feudalism?

There's still a king and a nobility

Also

Each Duke only governs a town

Is peasants can become nobles through service, then it's a meritocratic system

His sons will also inherit nobility

Good men raise good sons

Fair enough

So is there a cap to how big the nobility can be?

You'd have to work hard to become a noble, you'd have to perform something like military service

Hereditary Star Troopers beurocracy

gang

Plus distributism

All families have a privately owned farm

So it has a dash of Athenian democracy to it aswell

I can get behind this

More like Greek kingship

In Ancient Greece the average citizen knew and probably ate with at least one government official

Could you imagine that today?

Have you ever spoken to a member of your Senate or Parliament in person?

Every easter the Austrian Emperor invited the homeless for a feast

I mean, I have, but that's because I was a local party member at one point, but point taken

Could you imagine a President or a Prime Minister inviting people for a feast?

Every city will have a Duke

thus their will not be much distance between the state and the people

I believe in large but local government

Amen to that

How familiar are you with the Liecthenstinian constitution?

Not very

You should read it

I'm familiar with Greek and Russian societies and I want to emulate them

And just read up on LIecthensteins political system

I will, thank you brother

Yw fam

My politics are basically feudalism + Distributism

Makes sense enough to me

It seems slightly self-conflicting when you say it like that, seeing as how feudalism is almost by definition an elitist system, whereas distributism is more proletarian, but since you consider power positions to be another good which can be distributed it makes sense enough