In case of a guy in my parish, He raised in Confucian family, accepted Roman Catholic in late-teen, converted to the Orthodox 2 years ago.

I don't know really, it is my inclination though.

I've been reading a lot of Perennialist works like Rene Guenon.

So the natural choice for me would be Orthodoxy or Sufism.

>islame

ok man

don't be arian

We should have a literature division of the Legion

Like how the National Alliance has National Vanguard and Resistance Records

Guys

Yea?

Was there ever a heresy claiming that Christ was born of intimate relationships? I mean aside from the babilonian talmud?

Is there any refutations to it in the fathers or the councils?

The Talmud claims Mary was raped by a Roman

The book of Mormon claims that Mary was impregnated by Elohim willingly

For a while there was a heresy going around in Italy

Which stated that Christ wasn't born of a virgin

It was refuted by Alexander Borgia

Allright, but then it's a late heresy.

Where in the talumud can i find the "raping of mary"

I'm trying to refute somedude who made sacrilege on the Most Holy Theotokos saying that because she had free will to neglect Christ's birth, abortion is correct theologically, i already refuted his structure argument but he remains in the position that mary could not have been born of the supernatural conception.

What a ridiculous argument.

Oh i got that wrong he remains in the position that CHRIST could not have been born of supernatural conception lmao.

Why?

First he just made it adhoc but then he based himself on a stupid scientificist paradigma.

"Hurr durrr christ cannot be divine born cuz that ain't scientific"

He then made an argument like this.

"Haha, i love that people who are against abortion claim that science confirms human life begins at conception are the same people who deny Christ was concieved from sexual relationships"

I refuted that already from the guy too.

>scientific

What does that retard do for a living?

Run a page of cheap skeptic-protestant "theology"

There is not really much you can "argument" against pure nonsense, beyond telling him to stop trying to use big words he doesn't understand and grow a brain

How does a person become that misinformed?

It's not misinformation

It is wishful thinking

He wants to believe anything that justifies his filth

if any of you want something to do, the page Edgy Memes and Fashy Dreams posted an absolute RETARDED post about how Christians are bad except Arians

Indeed, i really did not need to argue a lot, i just made a little pointing of fallacies here and there, quotations on the talmud and pointing out you can't possibly try to imply Mary's "freedom" to choose Christ birth in the gospel means she would advocate for abortion in a modern conception of "brith freedom" without being theologically retarded and uncultured on cultural history and exegesis, the guy gave up hours ago.

You'd be surprised by how many of those retarded claims can be just answered with a "why?", since they are just arbitrary logical jumps where someone says for no reason that A implies B.