When something is supposed to be a transcript

It is stated so

For example, Revelations mentions explicitely that the author describes visions

The authors of the gospels write that they witnessed the facts, or collected information from witnesses

Paul writes his letters like anyone would

He doesn't say "God handed down these words, so I copied them in this letter"

im talking about the bible

not some letters

You don't know much about the Bible right?

Patrick, please tell us you're trolling already

The Bible includes many letters, they are part of the New Testament

1 Corinithian 16:22

Boy, oh boy.

This is hilarious.

yes it is indeed

Do you know why that is called Corinthians?

Because it is a letter to the corinthians

yeah

So it is a letter that is part of the Bible

I don't buy it

You're 100% trolling man

nah bro

So as you can see, when someone in Scrpture is giving a transcript of direct revelation

The author states so.

So in some books, or parts of books, you see that

The examples you have given, Revelations, etc

😉

But others are not. For example, the gospels are the account of witnesses, which we elevate to scripture

They wrote what they saw, which they knew from their first hand account

God didnt have to whisper into their ears so that they transcribed the words

Then we have the several letters, too

😄

In short, the Bible is a huge book actually consisting of many shorter books of different genres, it is important to know which genre, otherwise one doesn't understand it correctly

believe what u want bro

It is not what I want, it is what is in the Bible

The authors describe, for example, how they are witnesses, or they made sure they got reliable information

dont catholics like worship mary or something

Honor yes, worship no

i see

and you like pray through saints?

Ok, this has to be a troll at this point.