mfw you didnt include the best one with the heavy black to white logo

@Dasick <#452069937305878530>

@Luis perfect timing, my sister was just telling me about her disappointment over her previous priest's allegations

Lmao just completely cut contact wih your family and say you are disappointed by her <:thinksmirk:564102152239185920>

I would only cut ties with my family if they were constantly lambasting me for my beliefs or if they were devil worshippers.

I'm pretty alright with the rest of my family

Don't think I'll ever be able to bring them around.

And my mother would never forgive me if I ever did Begome Briesd,

But apart from that.

Do you guys agree that they should get rid of some bits of the bible? Like Ezekiel-- 23:20?

no, why?

and why that verse in particular?

it's degenerate

reason above

well yea do you know the context? it's about a sinful woman

yes but why compare it to animals?

what does it matter

Exodus 22:19

**Exodus 22:19 - Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA)**

```Dust


<19> Whosoever copulateth with a beast shall be put to death. ```

I know. But doesn't it seem indecent to you? It would be 10 times better if it didn't compare it to an animal.

Just imagine reading that verse in the church.

I don't think they would even bother with that one, it shouldn't be removed though.

Also, why do you have the Heathen tag? what are your beliefs exactly?

Agnostic atheist, I'm unsure about Christianity, but if I were to choose I would be a Catholic.

>mfw God created men with a pre-existing condition that makes them need the presence of a good woman to be/feel complete

Lotta internet re-trads like to reduce women to a dishwashing fuck-hole and call it traditionalism because they're crypto-incels with a "romantization" of history that's neither aligned with Scripture nor Church teaching to escape the fact that they as men are irredeemable pieces of shit lmao. God gave man a woman for a companion before He created more men.

Much to think about.

lol "crypto-incels"

I figured that was more charitable than what i really think of them

I mean, they have grounds to think that. Timothy telling them to shut up and all.

thats a pretty meme reading of timothy

but anyways, to answer your question:

we, the apostolics, believe that the councils are infallible as they were inspired by the holy spirit

and the canonical books that comprise the bible were determined through a council

@vhozonian if you read Timmothy it's about the Church fam.

Timothy told the women in a specific church to shut the fuck up because they were being autistic retards who wouldnt stop spazzing the fuck out about anything and everything

That doesn't mean God hates women or made them inferior or any such shit the way certain groups of people like to act or imply

I can't stand trads like that, I agree that women need men to guide them and all that, but we arent breeding machines that double as dishwashers

Imagine thinking you'll keep a woman by telling her, her opinions mean jack shit and she should shut up and pump out babies in silence lmao

There are women that think like that lmao, you go to Facebook and look up "Transformed Wife"

If she thought like that, she wouldn't have a blog. Women should be subservient to their husbands, but that doesn't take away their value. As the ones to raise the children women have a lot of impact even if trads don't want to admit it because they have the tism.

There is a difference between being a Godly woman and listening to your husband, and only washing dishes and never speaking your mind.