Message from @Fuckers
Discord ID: 630401851619016751
Literally 99% of people disagree with your statement that class doesn't exist
@Fuckers you admire the law of the jungle, I do not. this is the difference.
> 15:38] Thotsky: capacity of what?
capacity of doing things.
> and what's healthy? who determines what is healthy or not?
your feeling ?
If a foot is missing, you're not healthy, ok ?
Why does lower capacity automatically entail society being at a lesser stage of order?
I don't see order having anything to do with me missing a foot
this conversation is getting retarded
> 15:38] Thotsky: and why does lower complexity automatically entail order not being present?
I did not say that !
I told you about the meaning of **to create order**
so order is not present when we are at a lower stage of complexity?
How do I admire law of the jungle?
I support the exact opposite
@Leiro レイロ you seem to not understand the principle of
Order akin to Syntropy
Disorder akin to Entropy
> 15:47] Fuckers: How do I admire law of the jungle?
> [15:47] Fuckers: I support the exact opposite
No, you admire "class" thinking, see below. If you use *power* instead of *right*, this is the law of the jungle.
> 15:43] Fuckers: There absolutely is class
> 15:43] Fuckers: Those who have more power
@Fuckers the guy hasnt proven why not adhering to natural law makes us all primitvists
I use right instead of power
Capitalism is the law of the jungle
Lol
Letting innocents starve is right?
Cardcore capitalists have this sureal autistic moral bent no normal human comprehends not even liberals
> [15:50] Fuckers: Capitalism is the law of the jungle
not **is** but *uses*. Communism too !
How so?
It isn't a monolith
> 15:50] Fuckers: Letting innocents starve is right?
Yes.
Taking the land from them is not right !
That's called 🌠"psychopathy"🌠
The more you know
liquid is English your first language?
GG @Leiro レイロ, you just advanced to level 4!
> 15:51] Thotsky: the guy hasnt heard of social darwinists
I have heard that 🙂 One of the parts of the SATANIC IDEOLOGY !
well I have seen some capitalists advocate for it
Satanists are not social darwinists
Wut
> Letting innocents starve is right?
> [15:52] Fuckers: That's called 🌠"psychopathy"🌠
No it's not. You seem to not have a clue !
It is called Freedom !
It's called letting people starve to death
Starving is not freedom
This is morally bankrupt
he made an argument earlier that not following natural law is morally wrong
he's going to do a 180 on that, I bet
Natural law
> 15:54] Fuckers: Starving is not freedom
Wrong. To starve is like to use your rights.
To let starve is also a right.
I do NOT have a right to infringe on the other's rights !
Sound a lot like