they have requirement for air-superiority for reason lel :D

might actualy test war thunder for first time if they decide to add helis

chink 2080 when

2080

Warthunder more like grindthunder

Is AMD ever going to manage making decent mobile gpu's <:thvnk:332928260004642827>
Team green is getting memed to death

if amd just releases something a little bit decent

the internet will turn over amd favour instantly

Probably because of price I guess

Also apparently next AMD gpu should be having a new architecture so no more GCN

https://blogs.nvidia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/TuringVsPascal_EditorsDay_Aug22_v3-1.png

closest you're getting to benchmarks for now

and https://blogs.nvidia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/TuringVsPascal_EditorsDay_Aug22_v3-2-1280x720.png

benchmark what does not really tell what is measured

sure is marketing at its job

as far as i consider that chart its "dropped framed per second"

or "suddent fps drops"

Also as usual to nVidia, no numbers at all

Just vague "1 1.5 2"

Wonder if they gonna go again with the good ol' X scale so fucked they make 5% look like 50%

aint that already it

give stable line at 1 > then throw 2x+ there

what they could have done is drop that 1 line 1 block downwards

and make the segments in smaller increments

so that he differences look even more ridiculous

but yeah marketing being marketing there

@sum i know it can be hard for your grasp basic arithmetic

I knew it

its performance difference

No matter what you point out, no matter how shitty nVidia will act

You will still defend them

mmmmh

So what are you gonna say about Arkham Knight

no matter what gets posted, you will still attack them

And the **fact** nVidia sped up the gameplay

Since it wasn't 60fps

But they claimed it was

notice the part where i said >closest you're getting to benchmarks for now

implying it's not actual benchmarks

>calling nVidia graphs """""benchmarks""""""

It's not, and shouldn't be called benchmark