but idk what to do

but what others say about is : "its good and trust worthy in most cases out there"

@Goz3rr https://louwrentius.com/the-hidden-cost-of-using-zfs-for-your-home-nas.html there

worthy read about it

yeah I found that page too

pretty tldr: if you know how much and what you need : ZFS is godsend for your storage needs

but if you aim to slowly tune and expand

its not that great

dunno if other raid modes work differently on ZFS

oh yeah i meant to send this to you day or two ago @porco https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/turris-mox-modular-open-source-router#/ seen that yet ?

lettuce in your router?

https://www.youtube.com/embed/zAK0vK5XCKw?

their advert video is hilarious

@Tervy should I just run 4 disk RAID10 <:thonkang:327933449597878312>

ask /r/datahoarder

:P

and tbh its up to what you need as features,etc

i use mostly off-site systems these days

i only have learned not to run raid5

and never built more than 2 larger nas setups

where someone else did most of the "operating system" work

I have two disks and could increase that to 3-4 right now

but i have 8 bays and want to expand in the future

this one person said MDADM+LVM

i have no idea what that is lmao

mdadm is raid management and monitoring software what is qutie nice

he pretty much suggested software based raid system

not hardware based

gay

then ofc there is option for raid 6 madness what has most fault-tolerance :D

and requires 4 drives minimn

well, raid 6 is pretty equal to raid10

and but yeah im not a person to answer this question with enough knowledge

raid5/6 has a lot of write overhead because of parity

and they're slower to restore because of parity calculations

hence the 4 drives

4head

raid5 has a high chance of failure when one disk fails and you try to rebuild the matrix

that's a meme anyways

people quote the absolute maximum error rate for that

if your disk is at that point it was already dead anyways