Also, because he mentioned poachers, those assholes can be pretty inventive, as seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQG1bHugZRA

Even the "researcher" he referenced for his argument on trans isn't a scientist. The person has a degree in mikitary research from being in the military

That doesnt mean the are qualified to do research on the emotional or psychological impact of child trans issues

I get it, that "researcher" is trans. But that doesn't mean they are qualified on the subject, i have a butt hole, doesnt mean im qualified to be a psychologist

so instead of a trans research it's a trans researcher....

I mean, someone in the military can become a doctor/researcher.

That doesn't mean they're a good one though. I find that doctors who study psychological phenomena that they deal with tend to have more blinders than those who don't.

from what I hear most psychologists go into the field to solve their own psychological issues

Do we let people serve in the military if they have been diagnosed with a psychological condition that makes them want to cut their arm off? Or some who has been diagnosed and thinks they are a cat?

ah cut their arm off so body dysphoria

It's kind of like the line from Scarface isn't it? Never do your own stash.

Most psychology activists struggle with their own mental issues. Most psychologists I've met either haven't struggled, or if they have, they've "fixed" it.

It's after their own counseling that they enter the field.

His degree was in miltary research, not medical research

I personally don't really see degrees as much of a qualification of competence.

After he left the military to be a woman he startes being a journalist on trans issues

Thats not researcher, thats a journalist with a military reseaech degree

Degrees are and can be a qualification of competence, liberal degrees are not, and the aptitude of many college degrees these days has led to a lot of growth in graduate programs and certification programs to proce competence

not even journalist, that's activism

Undergraduate degree used to be more exclusive, so they meant something

imagine having such a narrow field as to cover maybe a couple thousand people worldwide

Just like your SATs and ACTs used to have a direct correlation to IQ, they removed that correlation for a reason, to create more inclusion into higher education

So what you're saying is....

Diversity is bad?

Diversity of aptitude in professions is bad :p

@Lord Zedd that's why they inflate the number.

it's a good racket for colleges though, charge through the ass for gender studies degrees that can only ever create more gender studies professors to teach more gender studies degrees

"have you ever entertained the thought at some point in your life if you were the opposite sex?" = Must be trans.

Its not just gender studies though, thats the one that we make fun of

i bet there's more cannibals in the world than trans people

But many business degrees and IT degrees leave people without the skills to immmediatly be productive

but we don't define people who aren't cannibals with a label to differentiate themselves from the cannibals

I find it laughable how business professors have any credibility in the field of business.

those who can't do teach

Those people still require some form of mentorship and OJT to get up to speed

That's why things like Praxis are cool.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnF1OtP2Svk
I'm amazed the left haven't gone after Mel Brooks yet

The nuns killed me

so many Jew jokes, I love that movie

Yeah i think i see some bias in this

https://youtu.be/f71Rasj_0JY

yeah he's a total lefty, really gives the sleazy lawyer vibe too

Is it just me, or does he look like an almost 50/50 mix of John Krasniski and Ryan Reynolds?