the power differential there was that there was more than one of them vs me

@Big T
No, not *for walking in the parking lot,* and I didn't say that.

I'm actually back already because I went looking for the video. Can't find it yet, but it was two types of assasinations, the first one was a SWAT team. All they had to do was get the protectee's red cover. They did it under a minute.
The second one was *'a modern ninja.'*
He entered posing as a set crewman, testing cameras.
Each time he'd get closer to the principal, getting the body guards more and more used to his presence; He even gave them the answer to a trivia question they had to answer (something about the M-1 Garand).
Finally, he got within arms reach of the principle, grabbed the cover...
And won.

She's not a ninja fyi

Not spec ops

@Mandatory Carry
i said that, because that is what is depicted in the second video. that is the only video in which they had a restraining order on her. in the first video they did not. this is pretty basic stuff bro.

ok cool ninja/swat video thing, but lets stick with the topic at hand.

She's a fat antifa member that hates Christians

She's not scouting out the building to make an attack at a future date

Shea trying to annoy the giu

Guy*

^

Nah, mandatory is just a living AnCap meme, who calls drones strikes on his neighbor when the sex slaves get loose and trespass on his property

haha

HE BROKE THE NAP

he hates ancaps tho

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSvdTDSqyWA

it is amusing that he identifes as a minarchist, which is a subset of libertarianism, but then says hes not a libertarian.

@C1PHER ANCAPs are to weak on the second amendment for him

im being a bit simplistic there, but the broad strokes are correct

because to him, the only libertarians are the weird lefty libertarians

AnComs, I guess

yea

naw, ancaps

he gets his sets mixed up

if A is a subset of B, he will say all B are A.

basically

lemme flesh that out a bit more

let A := ancaps, B := libertarians.
∀ A, A ⊆ B.

he tries to say ∀ B, B ⊆ A

Every rectangle is a square

@Big T I was talking about the sentencing disparities between men and women earlier btw. Women get lighter sentences even when they are armed and attacking and unarmed man, a case in which, I would argue, the physical power differential does not matter. Women are always thought of as victims and even if they attack a man we ask what the man did to make them attack him. We dont do that if a man attcks a woman.

I didn't come here for your Set bullshit Travis. I spent a lot of time letting that knowledge leak out of my brain, and I don't appreciate your efforts to shove it back in.

Idk why the physical power difference matters so much

If I bunch some chick in the face I punched her

If she punches me in the face she punched me

Same intent

so thats not a legal difference but a practical one

haha @wolfman1911 should i bring back eigenvectors too?

Not written in law

But the judges make it so?

@scaevola ah, well thats a different subject. valid self defense claims would result in no sentencing.

look at bigTravis trying to make us smart... I doubt it