Big I don't think actions are inherently bad I think actions are argued to be bad because of their outcome. So a deontologist believes killing is bad full stop. A consequentialist asks why did you kill and decides if it is bad

See? Moral relativist.

louis fucking christians are consequentialists in some respects

It's not his fault, it's just a product of his lefty upbringing and education. It would be like if your parents and everyone in your life taught you that evil was actually great

only if the deontologist defines all killing as bad.

I'm not seeing a condemnation of terrorism

america was founded on violence for political goals

name a country that wasnt

Violence to free ones self is not violence to stifle other's free expression or change political opinions

terrorism is not bad inherently what if it was a liberal uprising in Germany during Nazi rule, I would not believe this to be bad it is still terrorism though

right but you're basically okay with beating the shit out of people til they conform with your ideas

Violence in defense of one's rights is not terrorism. You aren't trying to change people's minds or enact policy, you're trying to defend yourself

one at a time guys I know im popular

He says, not responding to anything

louis you're changing the definition of terrorism

No, I'm not

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/266396659062145025/628159282403082250/unknown.png

ter·ror·ism
/ˈterəˌrizəm/
noun
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

yes

it has nothing to do with rights

a tyrannical government is an illegitimate government, and therefore overthrowing the government would be lawful.

Exactly

unlawful

is the only prerequsit

its an important oine

so in nazi germany they has laws

break them for political gain

terrorism

if a law is unconstitutional, it is no longer a law.

Fundamental rights transcend law. Any law which precludes fundamental rights or given by an illegitimate state, say, a monarchy which does not allow representation, is not legitimate

This should probably move to <#586033832277442590> anyways

thats the basis

@grant it doesnt matter at this hour

This only came up because you posted a video with a guy endorsing assault as an arguement. At first I thought the video was a parody of a leftist

'although we should concede one of these points, at some times someone on the left does through a milkshake at someone, that is because it is amusing to see arrogant people covered in milk. Admittedly not the most mature way to settle a political dispute... '

this is what he says

how is this endorsement

yeah, not best strategy but fine to do

He legit says it's amusing

it isn't?

No