Message from @Big T
Discord ID: 628157885020635137
a Democrat stronghold. democrat in this sentence is not an adjective
oh I thought you said 'democratic'
scroll up
yes I see
ok good
either way Canada just doesn't have the same right wing rally scale
so nothing to really oppose for antifa
so you're not against assault and vandalism, but just think they're bad strategy
this server is more of a US based server, so we will generally talk about things with a US centric frame, unless we are discussing something about another country
no im not a deontologist
I know that big but you were asking me if I live in a democrat stronghold
so I told you I live in canada
so if people just start beating up say ben shapiro and he gets afraid to talk politics because it you'd be okay with that?
might be bad strategy by if it achieves it end your fine with it
Of course he's a moral relativist
Literally subhuman
that's literally terrorism
so youre not a deontologist? are you consequentialist then?
Do you not remember when this guy said he wanted to see if the results were effective before taking a stance on lobotomies?
I wasn't there for that.
a deontologist would define something as right or wrong based on principles. somehow i dont think youre using that word correctly
It was the last time he was on the call-in show
no, he said he's not one
which would mean that he views right and wrong based on outcomes.
I sincerely hope he just didn't know what "lobotomy" meant
I don't know it seems like he's okay with terrorism as long as its towards his goals
a deontologist would saying the means justifies the ends. a consequentialist would say the ends justify the means
Big I don't think actions are inherently bad I think actions are argued to be bad because of their outcome. So a deontologist believes killing is bad full stop. A consequentialist asks why did you kill and decides if it is bad
See? Moral relativist.
louis fucking christians are consequentialists in some respects
It's not his fault, it's just a product of his lefty upbringing and education. It would be like if your parents and everyone in your life taught you that evil was actually great
only if the deontologist defines all killing as bad.
I'm not seeing a condemnation of terrorism
america was founded on violence for political goals
name a country that wasnt
Violence to free ones self is not violence to stifle other's free expression or change political opinions
terrorism is not bad inherently what if it was a liberal uprising in Germany during Nazi rule, I would not believe this to be bad it is still terrorism though
right but you're basically okay with beating the shit out of people til they conform with your ideas
Violence in defense of one's rights is not terrorism. You aren't trying to change people's minds or enact policy, you're trying to defend yourself
one at a time guys I know im popular
He says, not responding to anything