defects are not always the result of two people with "lesser" genes having a kid.

bad rolls happen lol

A. Never said anything about "lesser."
B. Sure. I'm no utopian.

i said it

like two ppl with recessive genes that express some sort of issue

Lol.

That's my exact point.

Let's not let them marry.

that would be one legit example of bad genetics, but quite often its an issue unrelated to it

Sure.

what do we do then?

Doesn't mean we shouldn't try to limit in in the areas we can predict it.

The exact same thing we do with incestuous relationships.

put them in prison and abort the kid?

Or that we used to with miscegenation prior to clown world....

Pretty sure that's not quite what the law says...

its a felony to commit incest

Sure. As it should be.

and many pro life places approve of abortion for incest

so it would follow

Fake and gay ones.

And as far as I know, even those groups aren't in favor of *mandatory* abortions in the case of incest.

so just prison

Yeah. Pretty much.

Again, we still do it for incest.

And when we were sane, we did it for miscegenation.

I mean, when you have a model that works, I really don't understand why you abandon it because reasons...

Well... I actually do understand why...

👃

https://youtu.be/owcCe-DnZZY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zX7vQ2QB6Eo

Problem with "eugenics" is we never would know how effective policies are until it's too late... Look at china and the 1 child program...

@Catboi
That's not eugenics tho...

Also, we all do eugenics everyday.

Or... whites do.

Everytime you decide not to bang a crazy skank without a condom?

Eugenics.

Modern eugenics is going to have a lot moer than just mate selection

going to be able to edit the genome

Unless in your _utopia_ that kind of technology is verboten

and I'm pretty sure the 1 child program would count as eugenics