He claimed to care about freedom of speech. which is a principle. But seems to have abandoned that and isn't defending the space he's in.

aka waffling like i said

or flip flopping if you will

I said in so far as it comes to Phil, even tho i don't like him myself. I can't make a blanket statement that he has no principles just because he doesn't engage topics i would prefer he wants to. That's how you might view Your principles, but that's not what principles are, other people can have different ones..

which means you really dont have that as a principle

yes shadows, we are talking about phil... obviously

@grant I agree, it would be nice if Phil was MORE principled, but that doesn't mean he has none...

@Shadows He probably had others but that was the one he proclaimed to have. now he doesn't even hold to that so why would he be better at ones he doesn't even want to hold publicly

He hasn't even justified why he won't back it other cases

idk what youre going on about "thats not what principles are". @Shadows

he doesnt stand by his principles, which is commonly referred to as "having no principles"

You don't know what his principles are... How do you know he doesn't have any.

....

Hank: it was a good article, seconds later it was badly done

so somehow it's badly done and a good article, he sees it as trash but it's useful to him but he's an ideologue

he did say free speech was one

really bro? how pedantic are we going to get?

@Lord Zedd Hank is retarded.

very much so

lets just all agree hank green is dumb

Me and the boys raggin on Hank greeeeeen

at least with John he's less overt with the retardation

just posted a time pool video on how wiki editors are trying to get alt-right associated with Phillip Defranco

<#266400976267640833>

lol

Chads

@Shadows this aint math, i do not need to prove for all X, that P(X)

in order to use that phrase

I kind of feel bad for him but not at the same time

Also the subject of the article is a plant

he handwaived this shit for so long

so he was never alt-right, and that NYT article is fake news

I hold Free Speech as one of my highest value, does this mean i have no limits on what should be said?
In fact i do have limit, i believe in things like libel and slander are good rules/laws we have.
Does this mean i don't like free speech?

no

so he was a civnat cuck all along?

again its not binary bro

@grant I bearly believe that he was ever alt-lite

My point is, you don't know what his lines are.

i swear everytime you make things binary

so?

I'm not making this binary.