I believe in natural rights, in limited government. Yet my 'side' of the argument are at best wrong, and at worst an insult to the men who built this republic

I'm forced to side with NatSocs, not because I agree with their ideas but because they are the only ones bothering to critique the system

a Nick Fuentes irritates the hell out of me, yet if you force me to pick between his type or Charlie Kirk that's not going to be a difficult decision

space space space

So what are you looking for?

pie

or lemonade

@McFansy was that directed at me or Airhiem?

you

gotcha

I hope to finish the republic

book

by plato

I want a restrained government, knowing the tyranny that an unrestrained government will inevitably become. But I want serious religious revival, to the point that once more Christianity is what is driving the culture, not progressivism. I want the traditional family structure rebuilt, and a return to the values that made such a structure so hard to assail

I want an armed populace, so that tyranny borders on impossibility

and swords lots of swords

@A. Spader guns and swords would be awesome for everyone roaming the lands no jok.

damn straight

bring back the Militia Act

a salt rifle

Cromwell's Commonwealth now?

lol

basically

there's a reason I like the guy

armor piercing salt

and its not just because he hated Christmas

high levels of civic nationalism, but those far surpassed by religious conviction. Small r republican government, with a heavily armed populace

yeah

Cromwell's Commonwealth is pretty close to my ideal government

England only worked with the English

sure

I don't dispute that

but it *can* be replicated

America's founders created a longer lasting version of the same system

do you see my dilemma @McFansy ?

Yes but I think you are missing out on the fact that American population has changed from the population of the founding

that bugasalt is accurate within 3 feet? Lame