@Old Man Hound
I'm going to have Shaniqua pillow you, you retarded boomer.

I mean, it makes sense that a person whose ideology was overtaken by a bunch of guys with AK's
Wants to convince people not to use them

@A. Spader If Jesus were around today he'd have passed an AK around with the loaves and fishes so all could be armed with a reliable and superior firearm.

>reliable and superior
are you serious

Jesus loves us, so we know he would give us a better gun than an AK

What impressed me is that not only are they superior in reliability, but they have a lot of clever design choices that make them efficient in combat.

Little design options that sacrifice flair for working when it counts.

dumping piles of sand and mud through your receiver is not a selling point

and moreover being the only ones left running irons on a rifle is mega cringe

although not as cringe as the boomer ass take that it makes them 'superior'

You're mocking design features that make them work in a real world situation, the same situation you talk about consistently.

what scenario? I don't pour sand in my ARs, nor does anyone else who understands what a firearm is

The Boomer is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a Shabbos goy, parasite, perpetual adolescent, hippy, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But tell him the AK sucks and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

Imagine you have to jump in a ditch to dodge a patrol or a hostile, do you want a gun that doesn't care about grass or banging the sight?

Or a fancy gun that will now be jammed and off-sight?

first of all the idea that ARs jam with a bit of mud is fudd lore

and the trees start speaking Vietnamese

C L E A N
L
E
A
N
Y O U R
O
U
R
W E A P O N
E
A
P
O
N

^

secondly no properly built rifle is gonna fail after a bit of mud or sand to begin with. Only literal morons who have no manual of arms training favor the AK, because they are the intended comsumer base of such a weapon

also

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAneTFiz5WU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyXndCxn9K4&t=548s

@A. Spader The only people I've seen dismiss the AK are people who do it without any real argument.

Nigger tier gun for example.

I don't know who that is, Kevin but I didn't write it.

Every serious soldier I've heard talk about experiencing them and using them says they're a very good firearm.

they work, which is what a soldier is good at knowing. But to call them superior is absolutely riddiculous

@Old Man Hound
O K A K
K
A
K

but you're running something that is at best an outdated platform

Even this video you link

@Old Man Hound
I didn't present a serious argument because you're not a serious person. You spout horseshit just to get a reaction.

Is bending over backwards to excuse the failures of the M16

your point being what exactly

the russians had decades to improve reliability and work out pressure issues

the M16 was adopted 3 years before widespread conflict

moreover even if the AK was superior in 1968 it's not even close to the AR now

@Unironic Ohio Supremecist Says the guy who has been one lining this entire time. Thank you for your feedback.

Yes. And I explained precisely why I did that.

@A. Spader Have you watched any pro AR videos?

wat